Comments for onenaught.com

Comment on Searching for apps and commands by typing rather than clicking; is typing the new clicking? by Anup Shah

Anup Shah — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:22:06 +0000

@Peter: Thanks for that. Am trying it out now, and it is really neat. I have seen similar things for Linux which are quite useful too.

It would be interesting to know if this is used more by people comfortable with technology or not. That’s why I found the Office add-on quite interesting, in particular.

Comment on Searching for apps and commands by typing rather than clicking; is typing the new clicking? by Peter Mescalchin

Peter Mescalchin — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:54:52 +0000

A great example of ‘typing rather than clicking’ can be seen in the excellent open source Launchy - basically Quicksilver for Windows.

http://www.launchy.net/

Comment on Why Use XSLT in Server Side Web Frameworks For Output Generation? by Anup Shah

Anup Shah — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:07:51 +0000

@Andrew: Thanks for your comment. The ObjectXPath navigator sounds interesting. I have heard of others try this too, so will certainly try to look into this further.

Comment on Why Use XSLT in Server Side Web Frameworks For Output Generation? by Andrew Mayorov

Andrew Mayorov — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:15:57 +0000

Hi!

You wrote a great article, and I could sign under every word. In our company we use XSLT for separation of data and view for 8 years already. It always worked perfectly.

I could only wish this approach to be wider used in open source project. This would greatly simplify seamless wielding of different (great, but standalone) parts into greater products.

Speaking of serialization process I’d suggest you to look at ObjectXPath navigator library. It allows for feeding object graph right into the XSLT processor thus allowing you not to serialize parts that are not required in this particular place of your code. Here you can read about it:
http://blogs.byte-force.com/tags/ObjectXPathNavigator/English/default.aspx

Release can be found in download section:
http://blogs.byte-force.com/files/folders/objectxpathnavigator/default.aspx

It’s agreed that this project will join MVP.XML, but I can’t find time for that for more than year already.

Best,
Andrew

Comment on Explaining Natural SEO: Search engine ranking vs indexing by Max

Max — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:31:23 +0000

I have not tried (or had time!) to really push it out anywhere or gather any interest so generally of course it doesn’t currently rank anywhere. That being said a few articles are already ranking reasonably well due to the niche topic (I think some of my posts on HTML 5, for example).

Comment on Onenaught.com nominated for a logo design award by Anup Shah

Anup Shah — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:09:51 +0000

Thanks Sameer!

Comment on Onenaught.com nominated for a logo design award by Sameer

Sameer — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:03:31 +0000

Congrats Bro..

I feel you can make the best graphics using the most primitive technical expertise if you put some heart into it.

Comment on The power of line height and whitespace by Comfortable Reading » Blog Archive » Bad typography #2 -Narrow Line-Heigth

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:01:04 +0000

[...] know why, but narrow line-height is ok to read on paper but reading it online it stinks. Here is a web developer that agrees. The first thing he does to improve a web site is to increas the [...]

Comment on Explaining Natural SEO: Search engine ranking vs indexing by Anup Shah

Anup Shah — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:13:11 +0000

@martin: Natural search helps, but I don’t think you can ever guarantee a first position in search results.

Comment on Explaining Natural SEO: Search engine ranking vs indexing by martin

martin — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:23:41 +0000

Good business needs a site that must appear on the first page of a search query. Natural SEO help to promote web site to be placed in the first position in search.