<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for onenaught.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onenaught.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onenaught.com</link>
	<description>A blog on web standards, accessibility, css, javascript, xslt, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 4 change: input type image only submits x and y, not name when clicked. Keyboard as before by Anup Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/comment-page-1#comment-14129</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=382#comment-14129</guid>
		<description>That was quick. The bug was marked as invalid because their behaviour follows the HTML 5 spec, whereas I was looking at the HTML 4.01 spec...

This is the comment in the bug report:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
However, our behavior is correct according to HTML5, which we&#039;re tracking:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm&lt;/a&gt;, step 7, substep 3 requires just image-button.x and image-button.y to be appended to the /form data set/, which will be submitted.

It looks like the specification follows IE and Opera in this case. If you&#039;d like to see this changed, please submit a bug to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&lt;/a&gt;, component &quot;HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)&quot;, or send an email to whatwg@whatwg.org.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Given IE (and Opera) do it this way anyway while webkit and gecko did not, I guess it was choosing one way or the other and with IE being still so popular many existing sites might not break as a result...

So one of the above workarounds it is then... or ponder on whether it is worth getting this changed...?

So, updating title to reflect this is a change to be aware of...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was quick. The bug was marked as invalid because their behaviour follows the HTML 5 spec, whereas I was looking at the HTML 4.01 spec&#8230;</p>
<p>This is the comment in the bug report:</p>
<blockquote><p>
However, our behavior is correct according to HTML5, which we&#8217;re tracking:<br />
<a href="http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm</a>, step 7, substep 3 requires just image-button.x and image-button.y to be appended to the /form data set/, which will be submitted.</p>
<p>It looks like the specification follows IE and Opera in this case. If you&#8217;d like to see this changed, please submit a bug to<br />
<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG</a>, component &#8220;HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)&#8221;, or send an email to <a href="mailto:whatwg@whatwg.org">whatwg@whatwg.org</a>.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Given IE (and Opera) do it this way anyway while webkit and gecko did not, I guess it was choosing one way or the other and with IE being still so popular many existing sites might not break as a result&#8230;</p>
<p>So one of the above workarounds it is then&#8230; or ponder on whether it is worth getting this changed&#8230;?</p>
<p>So, updating title to reflect this is a change to be aware of&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turn your jQuery code into a richer, unit testable, plugin by Interessante Links im Netz 12 &#124; DaRaFF&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/85/turn-your-jquery-code-into-a-richer-unit-testable-plugin/comment-page-1#comment-14102</link>
		<dc:creator>Interessante Links im Netz 12 &#124; DaRaFF&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=85#comment-14102</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.onenaught.com/posts/85/turn-your-jquery-code-into-a-richer-unit-testable-plugin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.onenaught.com/posts/85/turn-your-jquery-code-into-a-richer-unit-testable-plugin" rel="nofollow">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/85/turn-your-jquery-code-into-a-richer-unit-testable-plugin</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XSLT Tips for Cleaner Code and Better Performance by Anup Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/23/xslt-tips-for-cleaner-code-and-better-performance/comment-page-1#comment-14100</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/23/xslt-tips-for-cleaner-code-and-better-performance#comment-14100</guid>
		<description>Hi, I assume you mean HTML in the description element? It looks like it has been escaped with things like &amp;. Instead of that, if you are able to, can you have the HTML be in XML format rather than escaped? If you need to, you could write the HTML as well formed XML and put it in the XHTML namespace. Your XSLT could then match those elements and copy them out. 

This approach also lets you write XSLT templates to do things like filter out code you don&#039;t want, e.g. font tags, or more importantly script tags.

Hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I assume you mean HTML in the description element? It looks like it has been escaped with things like &amp;. Instead of that, if you are able to, can you have the HTML be in XML format rather than escaped? If you need to, you could write the HTML as well formed XML and put it in the XHTML namespace. Your XSLT could then match those elements and copy them out. </p>
<p>This approach also lets you write XSLT templates to do things like filter out code you don&#8217;t want, e.g. font tags, or more importantly script tags.</p>
<p>Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XSLT Tips for Cleaner Code and Better Performance by Francois Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/23/xslt-tips-for-cleaner-code-and-better-performance/comment-page-1#comment-14099</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/23/xslt-tips-for-cleaner-code-and-better-performance#comment-14099</guid>
		<description>I have a problem with this process - how to maintain HTML code in the XML elements content?  I&#039;ve tried to parse XML from http://refsbook.com  (i.e. http://refsbook.com/xml/taniafoto ), and some of the elements contain HTML code!!!  Is there a tag, attribute or a special tool for that in XSLT transormation?   Thank you for any help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with this process &#8211; how to maintain HTML code in the XML elements content?  I&#8217;ve tried to parse XML from <a href="http://refsbook.com" rel="nofollow">http://refsbook.com</a>  (i.e. <a href="http://refsbook.com/xml/taniafoto" rel="nofollow">http://refsbook.com/xml/taniafoto</a> ), and some of the elements contain HTML code!!!  Is there a tag, attribute or a special tool for that in XSLT transormation?   Thank you for any help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Explaining Natural SEO: Search engine ranking vs indexing by Mason Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/30/explaining-natural-seo-search-engine-ranking-vs-indexing/comment-page-1#comment-14098</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/30/explaining-natural-seo-search-engine-ranking-vs-indexing#comment-14098</guid>
		<description>link popularity is very important in order for your website to get higher up in the search results page of any search engine.-*:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>link popularity is very important in order for your website to get higher up in the search results page of any search engine.-*:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XSLT Tips for Cleaner Code and Better Performance by Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/23/xslt-tips-for-cleaner-code-and-better-performance/comment-page-1#comment-14091</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/23/xslt-tips-for-cleaner-code-and-better-performance#comment-14091</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for the code advice! Its much cleaner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for the code advice! Its much cleaner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WYSIWYG HTML Editors by Kevin Aldrich</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/28/wysiwyg-html-editors/comment-page-1#comment-14082</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Aldrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/28/wysiwyg-html-editors#comment-14082</guid>
		<description>Hey I have a question.  I work for a big company and all the wysiwyg editors work perfectly fine.  On my associate pc in the cubicle next to me, she cannot use the wysiwyg editor tools.  She can creat a table, but nothing else.  The buttons simply do not process the command.  Since it is only on a single editor, then it makes me believe it&#039;s a browser issue.  Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I have a question.  I work for a big company and all the wysiwyg editors work perfectly fine.  On my associate pc in the cubicle next to me, she cannot use the wysiwyg editor tools.  She can creat a table, but nothing else.  The buttons simply do not process the command.  Since it is only on a single editor, then it makes me believe it&#8217;s a browser issue.  Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turn your jQuery code into a richer, unit testable, plugin by Derick Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/85/turn-your-jquery-code-into-a-richer-unit-testable-plugin/comment-page-1#comment-14080</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=85#comment-14080</guid>
		<description>I was randomly just browsing sites having jQuery related posts and landed here. Glad that I did! I liked the way you have covered everything in detail, yet it is in an easy to understand manner. I don&#039;t know if this will interest you. There is a site called &lt;a href=&quot;www.u-2-me.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;u-2-me&lt;/a&gt;. There is a whole community of knowledge providers and knowledge seekers. You can actually engage in online teaching about jQuery. You would be great. Just thought I would let you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was randomly just browsing sites having jQuery related posts and landed here. Glad that I did! I liked the way you have covered everything in detail, yet it is in an easy to understand manner. I don&#8217;t know if this will interest you. There is a site called <a href="www.u-2-me.com" rel="nofollow">u-2-me</a>. There is a whole community of knowledge providers and knowledge seekers. You can actually engage in online teaching about jQuery. You would be great. Just thought I would let you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Explaining Natural SEO: Search engine ranking vs indexing by Anup Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/30/explaining-natural-seo-search-engine-ranking-vs-indexing/comment-page-1#comment-14079</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 10:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/30/explaining-natural-seo-search-engine-ranking-vs-indexing#comment-14079</guid>
		<description>@Tomas: you could submit them but if those directories are low quality themselves, and not relevant to your content, then I doubt it will help as much as getting even less backlinks from higher quality, relevant sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tomas: you could submit them but if those directories are low quality themselves, and not relevant to your content, then I doubt it will help as much as getting even less backlinks from higher quality, relevant sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Explaining Natural SEO: Search engine ranking vs indexing by Tomas Farhart</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/30/explaining-natural-seo-search-engine-ranking-vs-indexing/comment-page-1#comment-14077</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas Farhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/posts/30/explaining-natural-seo-search-engine-ranking-vs-indexing#comment-14077</guid>
		<description>i am a newbie in Search Engine Optimization but i think that the submission of articles in article directories is one of the best ways to gain backlinks. &#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am a newbie in Search Engine Optimization but i think that the submission of articles in article directories is one of the best ways to gain backlinks. &#8216;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
