<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 4 change: input type image only submits x and y, not name when clicked. Keyboard as before</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name</link>
	<description>A blog on web standards, accessibility, css, javascript, xslt, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/comment-page-1#comment-14904</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=382#comment-14904</guid>
		<description>Thank&#039;s Kurt, the button issue is the solution I needed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank&#8217;s Kurt, the button issue is the solution I needed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/comment-page-1#comment-14881</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=382#comment-14881</guid>
		<description>I had this issue with submit just after updating to Firefox 4.  My workaround was a little more simple (in my opinion)...it also works across the browsers.  I just made the submit button into just that...a button.  
Notice the class.  I didn&#039;t like the automatic styling that the browsers give to buttons so I stripped the background, margin, padding, and border in a simple style sheet.  Now it works just great!  Hope this helps someone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this issue with submit just after updating to Firefox 4.  My workaround was a little more simple (in my opinion)&#8230;it also works across the browsers.  I just made the submit button into just that&#8230;a button.<br />
Notice the class.  I didn&#8217;t like the automatic styling that the browsers give to buttons so I stripped the background, margin, padding, and border in a simple style sheet.  Now it works just great!  Hope this helps someone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Zoglmann</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/comment-page-1#comment-14879</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Zoglmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=382#comment-14879</guid>
		<description>My example failed to post the HTML, but you can get an idea of the solution by using button and looking at the web page below.

http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmltags/p/bltags_button.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My example failed to post the HTML, but you can get an idea of the solution by using button and looking at the web page below.</p>
<p><a href="http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmltags/p/bltags_button.htm" rel="nofollow">http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmltags/p/bltags_button.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Zoglmann</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/comment-page-1#comment-14878</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Zoglmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=382#comment-14878</guid>
		<description>A quick fix is to use the button attribute...

before:




after:

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick fix is to use the button attribute&#8230;</p>
<p>before:</p>
<p>after:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/comment-page-1#comment-14870</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 12:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=382#comment-14870</guid>
		<description>Thx! Now I know why my form didn&#039;t work! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx! Now I know why my form didn&#8217;t work! <img src='http://www.onenaught.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.onenaught.com/posts/382/firefox-4-change-input-type-image-only-submits-x-and-y-not-name/comment-page-1#comment-14129</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenaught.com/?p=382#comment-14129</guid>
		<description>That was quick. The bug was marked as invalid because their behaviour follows the HTML 5 spec, whereas I was looking at the HTML 4.01 spec...

This is the comment in the bug report:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
However, our behavior is correct according to HTML5, which we&#039;re tracking:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm&lt;/a&gt;, step 7, substep 3 requires just image-button.x and image-button.y to be appended to the /form data set/, which will be submitted.

It looks like the specification follows IE and Opera in this case. If you&#039;d like to see this changed, please submit a bug to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&lt;/a&gt;, component &quot;HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)&quot;, or send an email to whatwg@whatwg.org.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Given IE (and Opera) do it this way anyway while webkit and gecko did not, I guess it was choosing one way or the other and with IE being still so popular many existing sites might not break as a result...

So one of the above workarounds it is then... or ponder on whether it is worth getting this changed...?

So, updating title to reflect this is a change to be aware of...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was quick. The bug was marked as invalid because their behaviour follows the HTML 5 spec, whereas I was looking at the HTML 4.01 spec&#8230;</p>
<p>This is the comment in the bug report:</p>
<blockquote><p>
However, our behavior is correct according to HTML5, which we&#8217;re tracking:<br />
<a href="http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatwg.org/html/#form-submission-algorithm</a>, step 7, substep 3 requires just image-button.x and image-button.y to be appended to the /form data set/, which will be submitted.</p>
<p>It looks like the specification follows IE and Opera in this case. If you&#8217;d like to see this changed, please submit a bug to<br />
<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG</a>, component &#8220;HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)&#8221;, or send an email to <a href="mailto:whatwg@whatwg.org">whatwg@whatwg.org</a>.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Given IE (and Opera) do it this way anyway while webkit and gecko did not, I guess it was choosing one way or the other and with IE being still so popular many existing sites might not break as a result&#8230;</p>
<p>So one of the above workarounds it is then&#8230; or ponder on whether it is worth getting this changed&#8230;?</p>
<p>So, updating title to reflect this is a change to be aware of&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

